Pharmacognostic Study of
Leaf and Bark of Nerium oleander and Eugenia jambolana
Mohini Upadhye*,
Snehal Avhad, Prajkta Dhaygude, S. N. Dhole
Department of Pharmacognosy, P.E. Society’s Modern
College of Pharmacy (For Ladies) Borhadewadi, Dehu Alandi road, Moshi, Pune-412 105 Maharashtra
ABSTRACT:
The
plant of Nerium oleander is used in various diseases
like cancer. It is also used as diaphoretic, diuretic, emetic, expectorant, and
resolvant. Eugenia
jambolana is used as antibacterial, strengthening
of teeth and gums. Both the plants are extensively used as tribal medicines in
different parts of country.
As
there is no record of pharmacognostical work on such
potential drugs, the present work is taken up to produce the pharmacognostical standards. The study deals with the pharmacognostical examinations, morphological, microscopical characters. Phytochemical characteristics of
leaves and bark of Nerium oleander and Eugenia jambolana were also determined
which include determination of leaf constants, ash values, foaming index,
,swelling index, moisture content and extractive values, foreign organic
matter, crude fiber content etc as per official guidelines.
KEY WORDS: Nerium oleander, Eugenia jambolana, bark, leaves, microscopy, physicochemical
parameters.
INTRODUCTION:
Nerium oleander (Apocynaceae) is cultivated
worldwide as an ornamental plant. All parts of the plant are used as
anticancer, cardiotonic, diaphoretic, diuretic,
emetic, expectorant, resolvant, skin sternutatory. The leaves of Eugenia jambolana are antibacterial and
used for strenghning the teeth and gums. The fruits
and seeds are acrid, sour, sweet, tonic, cooling and are used in diabetes. The
bark is astringent and is also used in deaction in
case of chronic diarrhea and dysentery. It is also used as gargle in sore
throat. The fruits are used extensively in the treatment of diabetes.
Therefore, the present investigations were planed to
study the leaves and bark of Nerium oleander
and Eugenia jambolana
(1).
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Plant Material:
The
leaves and bark of Nerium oleander and Eugenia jambolana
were collected from Moshi in the month of October and
was authenticated by Dr. Dinesh Shirodkar,
Indian Botanical Survey, Yerwada, Pune.
Pharmacognostical Studies(2- 4)
The
plants were studies for morphological characters like shape, size, surface,
base, margin and venation. The organoleptic
characters such as taste, odour and colour of leaves as well barks were studied.
The
microscopic studies were carried out using Nikon Camera. The clear free hand
sections of leaves and bark which were previously soaked and boiled with
chloral hydrate to remove the colouring matter were
selected and mounted on a clean glass slide using glycerine
and covered with cover slip. The sections were then viewed under low power 10X
and 45X. The sections were stained with phloroglucinol
and concentrated HCl. It was observed that lignified
xylem of vascular bundle were stained pink. The starch grains were stained with
dil Iodine. Some of the sections were also stained
with Sudan Red for cuticle, Rhuthenium Red for
mucilaginous cells and Acetic acid for calcium oxalate.
As
a part of quantitative microscopy Stomatal number, Stomatal index, Vein islet number, Vein termination number were
determined by using fresh leaves of the plants with the help of camera lucida.
The
leaves and bark of Nerium oleander and Eugenia jambolana were powdered and
subjected to powder microscopy. Powders were stained with phloroglucinol
and concentrated HCl.
Various
physicochemical parameters like total ash value, acid
insoluble ash value, water soluble ash value, alcohol and water soluble
extractive value, moisture content, foaming index, swelling index, foreign
organic matter were determined as per the WHO guidelines. The aqueous and
ethanol extracts were subjected to preliminary phytochemical
screening. (5)
Table 1 Physical parameters of Nerium oleander and Eugenia
jambolana
SR.NO |
ANALYTICAL Parameter |
Nerium oleander |
Eugenia jambolana |
||
Leaves |
Bark |
Leaves |
Bark |
||
1 |
ASH
VALUE a)
Acid insoluble ash b)
Water soluble ash |
13%
w/w 2% w/w |
9%
w/w 2%
w/w |
9.25%w/w 13.25%w/w |
14.75% 2.75% |
2 |
EXTRACTIVE
VALUE a)
Water soluble extractive value b)
Alcohol soluble extractive value |
2%
6%
|
4%
w/w 10%
w/w |
4%w/w 2%w/w |
6%
4% |
3 |
FOREIGN
ORGANIC MATTEROF 100 gm |
0.5%
w/w |
2%
w/w |
1%w/w |
2% |
4 |
MOISTURE
CONTENT |
2%
w/w |
2%
w/w |
7%w/w |
8% |
5 |
FOAMING
INDEX |
Less
than 100 |
Less
than 100 |
Less
than 100 |
Less
than 100 |
6 |
SWELLING
INDEX |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Table 2 Quantitative
constants of Nerium oleander and Eugenia jambolana
1 |
STOMATAL NO. |
0.6/mm2 |
13/mm2 |
2 |
STOMATAL INDEX |
0.9/mm2 |
28.8/mm2 |
3 |
VEIN ISLET NO. |
12/mm2 |
13.4/mm2 |
4 |
VEIN TERMINATION |
12/mm2 |
29.4/mm2 |
Table 3: Preliminary Phytochemical Sreening
of Nerium oleander
Sr. No. |
Plant Constituents |
Nerium oleander Leaf |
Nerium oleander Bark |
||
Aqueous Extract |
Alcoholic Extract |
Aqueous Extract |
Alcoholic Extract |
||
1 |
Carbohydrates |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
2 |
Proteins |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
3 |
Amino acids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
4 |
Glycosides |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
5 |
Fats and oils |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
6 |
Steroids |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
7 |
Alkaloids |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
Flavonoids |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
9 |
Phenolic comds and tannins |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
(+) denotes Presence (-) denotes Absence
Table 4: Preliminary Phytochemical Sreening
of Eugenia jambolana
Sr. No. |
Plant Constituents |
Eugenia jambolana Leaf |
Eugenia jambolana Bark |
||
Aqueous Extract |
Alcoholic Extract |
Aqueous Extract |
Alcoholic Extract |
||
1 |
Carbohydrates |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
2 |
Proteins |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
Amino acids |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
Fats and oils |
- |
+ |
+ |
+ |
5 |
Steroids |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
6 |
Volatile oils |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
7 |
Glycosides |
+ |
- |
+ |
+ |
8 |
Tannins |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
9 |
Flavonoids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
10 |
Alkaloids |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(+) denotes Presence (-) denotes Absence
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
The
leaves of Nerium oleander were 10 to 22 cm long, narrow,
untoothed, short stalked, dark grey or green in colour, with prominent midrib, leathery in texture and
arise in groups of 3 from the stem. The leaves of Eugenia jambolana were green coloured, elliptical, oblong with acute apex, smooth and
shiny texture with characteristic odour and taste.
The
bark of Nerium oleander was grayish brown in colour with scars. The smooth longitudinal fractures were
observed with bitter odour and characteristic taste.
The bark of Eugenia jambolana
was found to be reddish brown in colour with silky
luster and marked with waving ridges and having bitter taste and characteristic
odor.(6)
Transverse
section of the leaf of Nerium oleander through midrib showed presence
of single layered upper and lower epidermis with anamocytic
stomata, uniserrate multicellular
covering trichomes and glandular trichomes.
Mesophyll showed isobilateral leaf pattern and it was
differentiated into palisade and spongy parenchyma. The palisade layer was
single layered, elongated and compact cells and the spongy parenchyma is 5 to 8
layered, loosly arranged cells with intercellular
spaces. The midrib region showed strips of collenchyma
appeared below upper epidermis and above the lower epidermis. A well developed
vascular bundle is seen in the midrib region. Xylem was lignified while phloem
was unlignified.
The
leaf of Eugenia jambolana
was isobilateral with covering trichomes and paracytic stomata. Collenchyma
was faint brown in colour and present above the lower
epidermis. Mesophyll region showed presence of
palisade, spongy parenchyma and a well developed vascular bundle was observed
in the midrib region.
The
bark of Nerium oleander exhibits the typical
histological characteristics of the bark. Cork cells were yellowish brown, thin
walled followed by phelloderm showing presence of
prismatic calcium oxalate crystals and starch grains. The phloem was unlignified
and shows sieve tubes, companion cells and parenchyma. Xylem vessels were
lignified, thick walled and arranged along with xylem fibers. The medullary rays were radialy
arranged from centre to the cortex through the vascular region.
The
transverse section of the bark of Eugenia
jambolana showed the outer several layers of
tangentially elongated cells followed by the phellogen
and phelloderm. Continuous band of lignified, pitted,
oval cells containing calcium oxalate crystals were present in the cortex
region. Medullary rays showed presence of two to
three celled thin walled radially elongated parenchymatous cells in the secondary phloem region. (7)
The
powder analysis of Nerium oleander leaves revealed the presence
of uniserrate, multicellular
covering trichomes, glandular trichomes,
lignifies and nonlignified fibers, anamocytic stomata while bark shows dark brownish cork
cells, lignified fibers, prismatic calcium oxalate crystals and starch grains.
The
powder analysis of leaves of Eugenia jambolana showed the presence of covering trichomes, paracytic stomata,
calcium oxalate crystals, xylem vessels, lignified and nonlignified
fibers while that of bark showed presence of cork cells. The stone cells were
lignified, oval and pitted. Calcium oxalate crystals, medullary
rays, lignified and nonlignified fiber were also
observed in the powder. (8, 9)
Results
of various physicochemical parameters including ash values, Extractive values,
foreign organic matter, moisture content, foaming index, swelling index of
leaves and bark of Nerium oleander and Eugenia jambolana are represented in
Table no. 1. Results of quantitative microscopical
parameters such as stomatal number, stomatal index, vein islet number, vein termination number
are represented in Table No. 2. Table No. 3 and 4 represent the results of
preliminary phytochemical screening of aqueous and
alcoholic extracts of leaves and bark of Nerium oleander and Eugenia jambolana.
Thus,
macro and micro morphological standards discussed for Nerium oleander and Eugenia jambolana can be considered as distinguishing
parameters to identify the authenticity of drugs in herbal industry or trade
and thus can be included as microscopic standards in Indian Herbal
Pharmacopoeia.
REFERENCES
1.
Nadkarni A. K. Indian Materia Medica,
vol. 1, Popular Prakashan, 1996, page no.:
847-849.
2.
Rangari V. D., Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry,
Career publications, first edition, 84-85.
3.
Anonymous, Indian
Pharmacopoeia, Vol. 2, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India,
Controller of Publication, New Delhi, 1996, P. A. - 47, A – 53, A – 54.
4.
Khandelwar K. R., Practical Pharmacognosy, Techniques and
Experiments, Edition 12, Nirali Prakashan,
2004, 9, 146, 149.
5.
Kokate C. K., Practical Pharmacognosy, Edition 4, Vallabh Prakashan, Delhi 2005, 7,
14, 97, 107.
6.
Trease and Evans, Pharmacognosy, W. C. Evans, 15th
Edition, 95.
7.
Pharmacognostical studies of Neolamarcki cadamba (roxb)., Bosser leaf, Divyakant Patel, Vimal Kumar, International Journal of Green Pharmacy, Vol.
2, Issue 1, Jan – March, 2008, Page no. 26 – 27.
8.
K. R. Brain and T.
D. Turner, Practical Evaluation of Phytopharmaceuticals,
Wright – Scientechnica, Bristol, 36 – 45 (1975 b).
9.
Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Phyllanthus reticulatus Poir, Ashwath Ram H. N., Shreedhara C.
S., Gajera Phalguni P. and Zanwar Sachin B., Pharmacognosy
Magazine, Vol. 4, Issue 18, Apr – June 2009, Page no. 176-182.
Received on 20.08.2012
Modified on 02.09.2012
Accepted
on 18.09.2012
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmacognosy
and Phytochemistry. 4(5): September – October 2012, 277-279